AL-HAU24news

From Elemde Dele

In the unfolding drama of Edo State’s gubernatorial race, the principles of Justice, Equity, and Fairness (JEF) have emerged as central themes, shaping the discourse around candidacy and electoral legitimacy.

The spotlight falls squarely on Olumide Akpata, Esq., a candidate hailing from Edo South Senatorial District, the same district as the outgoing governor, Godwin Obaseki. This geographic connection has sparked debates over the appropriateness of his candidacy within the context of Edo State’s political landscape.

A critical concern raised by constituents is the issue of zoning and its implications for political representation. Edo State, like many regions in Nigeria, grapples with the imperative of ensuring equal access to power across its diverse senatorial districts. The prevailing sentiment posits that Edo Central Senatorial District should rightfully produce the next governor, fostering a rotation of power that reflects the state’s demographic balance.

Proponents of zoning argue that it is a necessary mechanism to uphold fairness and inclusivity in governance, preventing the monopolization of power by any particular district or group. The current zoning consensus underscores the belief that each senatorial district should have its turn in leadership, thereby integrating diverse communities into the political fabric of the state.

Akpata’s candidacy, however, has been met with skepticism within this framework. Critics argue that his bid represents a departure from the principles of JEF, given his geographic and familial ties to the incumbent governor. This contention underscores broader debates within Nigerian politics about the ethical dimensions of electoral representation and the imperative of equitable power-sharing.

The ongoing discourse encapsulates broader issues of electoral practice and governance in Nigeria, where the concept of zoning plays a pivotal role in navigating complex socio-political dynamics. As Edo State prepares for its gubernatorial election, the intersection of zoning, justice, and fairness promises to define the contours of political engagement and electoral legitimacy.